12th Annual Education Symposium: April 22, 2013
Abstract Guidelines

New this year: All posters will be digital (no paper posters), and displayed on monitors in the Teaching and Learning Center (2nd floor, Parnassus Library). Poster specifications and templates will be available in February.
Event name change
: As this event has grown to include a day and a half’s worth of activities, we have changed the name from Education Day to the Education Symposium.

Please submit your abstract in electronic format using the survey link at the bottom of this page (click here to view sample abstracts). To make submission easier, we recommend that authors prepare them in advance on a personal computer, and cut and paste the text into the online survey.

Abstract word count should not exceed 300 words, including references, but excluding title and authors.
Abstract submission template


Abstracts may be submitted in one of two categories:

  • 1) Curriculum Development Projects: Summaries of curricular innovations.
    2) Curriculum Evaluation/Educational Research Projects: Summaries of educational research or curricular evaluation.

If it is difficult to decide which category is most appropriate, please contact Amin Azzam, chair of the Academy Scholarship Working Group, Amin.Azzam@ucsf.edu.

Authors will also be asked to indicate medical education areas the abstract addresses (i.e., undergraduate medical education (UME), graduate medical education (GME), and/or continuing medical education (CME), as well as the top three domains the abstract focuses on (click here for a list of domains).

Each accepted abstract will be scheduled as one of the following: (1) a digital poster presentation, which will require participation in a 60-minute moderated poster viewing session and a 45-minute un-moderated poster session, or (2) a 15-minute oral presentation. (Please note: the durations of the poster sessions are approximate, and will be confirmed in March 2013.)

    1. Oral Presentations: These 15-minute oral presentations will take place from 8:30-10:30 am. The format of these sessions should include a presentation of the background, methods, results and discussion/conclusion with time for discussion and questions from the audience.


    2. Poster Sessions: Will be held in the Teaching and Learning Center from 12:15-3:45pm
  • Two moderated tours of posters and two un-moderated sessions will be scheduled.
  • Authors will be assigned to one of these moderated sessions.
  • Posters will be grouped by subject matter to foster interaction between poster discussants and the audience. No other concurrent programming will be scheduled during these times to encourage attendees to visit the poster sessions and interact with the presenters.

The Scholarship Working Group will determine the presentation format for each proposal based on the abstract topic and relationship to others submitted.


    Abstracts are organized into the following categories below. These categories mirror Glassick's criteria for scholarship in teaching and learning, which will be also used in the peer review process.

    Curriculum Development:
    Educational Research/
    Curriculum Evaluation:
    Purpose: Clearly describe the project's goals and objectives.

    Purpose: Clearly describe the project's hypothesis, goals and objectives.

    Background: Describe how the curriculum innovation was informed by knowledge of previous scholarly work or knowledge of educational principles.

    Background: Describe the project's importance, curricula (if study is curriculum evaluation), and how the research/evaluation plan was informed by knowledge of previous scholarly work or knowledge of educational principles.

    Methods: Describe the approaches used to teach in this setting and how these approaches have been adjusted to the particular features of the material, setting, and learners.

    Methods: Describe the research methods or methods of evaluation including subjects, protocol and measurement of outcomes.

    Evaluation Plan: Describe the outcomes that will tell you whether your curriculum is effective. Results: Describe the findings of the study/evaluation including response rate, results, and statistical testing where appropriate.
    Dissemination: Describe your plans for making the results of your curriculum project available to colleagues (talks, posters, publications, websites, etc.). Discussion: State concisely the data-driven conclusion of your study/evaluation and how the results of the project are being (or will be) made available to colleagues.
    Reflective Critique: Describe the steps taken to solicit feedback regarding your curriculum project and how it has been (or will be) modified based on the feedback. Reflective Critique: Describe the steps taken to solicit feedback regarding your study or curriculum evaluation and how it has been (or will be) modified based on the feedback.


    You are encouraged to sign up for a pre-submission consultation of your abstract draft at ESCape, UCSF's Weekly Educational Scholarship Conference. Consultation sessions will take place on January 22, January 29, and February 5, and spaces will fill up fast. To sign up, please send an email to Victoria Ruddick at ruddickv@medsch.ucsf.edu, indicating that you are interested in scheduling a consultation session for your Education Symposium abstract, and include the abstract title. Click to see the ESCape schedule.


    Authors submitting abstracts will be notified of decisions via email by March 15, 2013.